People v Raner

Annotate this Case
People v Raner 2008 NY Slip Op 04405 [51 AD3d 1224] May 15, 2008 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, July 16, 2008

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shane Raner, Appellant.

—[*1] Jeffrey V. Jamison, Albany, for appellant.

David S. Hartnett, District Attorney, Cortland (Wendy L. Franklin of counsel), for respondent.

Carpinello, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Cortland County (Ames, J.), rendered April 24, 2007, which revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of incarceration.

Defendant was charged with a probation violation and, in April 2007, appeared before County Court and admitted to violating three conditions of his probation. Based upon those admissions, and in accordance with the negotiated plea, defendant's probation was revoked and he was resentenced to one year in the local jail. This appeal by defendant ensued.

Counsel for defendant confirms that defendant was released from jail in October 2007. Accordingly, defendant's challenge to the sufficiency and voluntariness of his plea, as well as his claim that the resentence imposed was harsh and excessive, has been rendered moot (see People v Lesson, 32 AD3d 1083 [2006]; People v Hamilton, 214 AD2d 783 [1995]). Inasmuch as defendant's appeal does not present "recurring issue[s] of public interest which would otherwise escape appellate review" (People v Anderson, 197 AD2d 749, 750 [1993], lvs denied 82 NY2d 890 [1993], 82 NY2d 921 [1994]), dismissal of the appeal is warranted.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Rose and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.