Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law . 468-a. v Denise M. Curran

Annotate this Case
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law \s 468-a (Curran) 2005 NY Slip Op 06081 [20 AD3d 808] July 21, 2005 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, September 21, 2005

In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Denise M. Curran, Respondent.

—[*1]Per Curiam. Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1993, was suspended by this Court's order dated November 20, 1998, for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (255 AD2d 827 [1998]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ.,concur. Ordered that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.