People v Baker

Annotate this Case
People v Baker 2022 NY Slip Op 02426 Decided on April 13, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 13, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.
2020-07736
2020-07740
(Ind. No. 641/19, S.C.I. No. 48/20)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Terrell Baker, appellant.



Thomas R. Villecco, Jericho, NY, for appellant.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, NY (Alexander J. H. Ochoa and Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Orange County (Craig Stephen Brown, J.), both rendered September 15, 2020, convicting him of assault in the second degree under Indictment No. 641/19, and criminal contempt in the first degree under Superior Court Information No. 48/20, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

The record does not establish that the defendant's waiver of the right to appeal was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, as the County Court mischaracterized the nature of the right to appeal by stating that the defendant's convictions and sentences would be final (see People v Shanks, 37 NY3d 244, 252; People v Bisono, 36 NY3d 1013, 1017-1018; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264), and the written waiver form did not clarify that appellate review remained available for select issues (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 566; People v Brown, 195 AD3d 943, 943). Thus, the purported waiver does not preclude this Court's review of the defendant's excessive sentence claim.

Nevertheless, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

CONNOLLY, J.P., ROMAN, CHRISTOPHER and FORD, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.