People v Davis

Annotate this Case
People v Davis 2022 NY Slip Op 03005 Decided on May 4, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 4, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
SHERI S. ROMAN
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.
2020-00292

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Megan I. Davis, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 262/17)



Del Atwell, East Hampton, NY, for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Anna Katharina Diehn of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Edward T. McLouglin, J.), rendered December 16, 2019, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that she violated conditions thereof, upon her admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

ORDERED that the amended judgment is affirmed.

Inasmuch as the defendant has completed the imposed sentence, the defendant's contention that the sentence is excessive has been rendered academic (see People v Valentin, 173 AD3d 1227, 1227; People v Raad, 166 AD3d 907, 908; People v Stockinger, 131 AD3d 550).

The defendant's contention that defense counsel was ineffective is without merit (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712).

LASALLE, P.J., ROMAN, CHRISTOPHER and DOWLING, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.