Talmadge v Holden

Annotate this Case
Talmadge v Holden 2022 NY Slip Op 03919 Decided on June 15, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 15, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
PAUL WOOTEN
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.
2020-00154
(Index No. 718/18)

[*1]Ryan Talmadge, plaintiff,

v

Roy F. Holden, respondent, Katielyn N. Shimer, appellant.



Bryan R. Kaplan, Rock Hill, NY, for appellant.

Burke, Scolamiero & Hurd, LLP, Albany, NY (Steven V. DeBraccio of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Katielyn N. Shimer appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Robert J. Onofry, J.), dated December 5, 2019. The order granted the motion of the defendant Roy F. Holden for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The appellant is not aggrieved by the order granting the motion of her codefendant Roy F. Holden for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him (see CPLR 5511; Mixon v TBV, Inc., 76 AD3d 144). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.

BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., IANNACCI, WOOTEN and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.