People v Jackson
Annotate this CaseDecided on June 9, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
MARK C. DILLON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.
2021-00041
(Ind. No. 2826/05)
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Erwin Jackson, appellant.
Erwin Jackson, Elmira, NY, appellant pro se.
Joyce Smith, Acting District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Jason R. Richards and Monica M. C. Leiter of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from an amended order of restitution of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jerald S. Carter, J.), dated April 19, 2012.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
This appeal must be dismissed. "The right to appeal in a criminal action is purely statutory" (People v Taylor, 99 AD2d 820, 820; see People v Santos, 64 NY2d 702, 704). The Criminal Procedure Law enumerates the judgments, sentences, and orders from which a defendant may appeal as of right or by permission (see CPL 450.10; 450.15; People v Jackson, 152 AD3d 796; People v Morse, 148 AD3d 611; People v Taylor, 99 AD2d 820; People v Fricchione, 43 AD3d 410, 411). The amended order of restitution at issue is not one of these enumerated papers, and accordingly, this Court is without jurisdiction to hear this appeal (see People v Jackson, 159 AD3d 921; People v Morse, 148 AD3d at 611; People v Fricchione, 43 AD3d at 411).
LASALLE, P.J., DILLON, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.