Matter of Morales v Singas

Annotate this Case
Matter of Morales v Singas 2020 NY Slip Op 03110 Decided on June 3, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 3, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
HECTOR D. LASALLE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.
2020-01686

[*1]In the Matter of Adam Morales, petitioner,

v

Madeline Singas, etc., et al., respondents. Adam Morales, West Hempstead, NY, petitioner pro se.



Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Hempstead, NY (Michelle Burke of counsel), respondent pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent Douglas J. Lerose.



DECISION & JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition and mandamus to prohibit the respondents from proceeding with an underlying criminal prosecution entitled People v Morales, pending in the District Court, Nassau County, under Indictment No. CR-021434-18NA, and to compel the respondents to dismiss the criminal charges in that action.

ADJUDGED that the petition and the proceeding are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding (see CPLR 7804[b]; 506[b]; Matter of Nolan v Lungen, 61 NY2d 788, 789-790; Matter of Wheeler v Kahn, 153 AD3d 926, 927; Matter of Canestro v Pineda-Kirwan, 132 AD3d 863, 863).

RIVERA, J.P., AUSTIN, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.