Bigfoot Media Props., LLC v Cushman In T, LLC

Annotate this Case
Bigfoot Media Props., LLC v Cushman In T, LLC 2020 NY Slip Op 03887 Decided on July 15, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 15, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.
2018-03546
(Index No. 69452/16)

[*1]Bigfoot Media Properties, LLC, appellant,

v

Cushman In T, LLC, respondent, et al., defendant.



George S. Bellantoni, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

Belowich & Walsh LLP, White Plains, NY (Joanna F. Sandolo and Daniel G. Walsh of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lewis J. Lubell, J.) dated March 21, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on so much of the complaint as sought the return of a down payment in the principal sum of $200,000 plus accrued interest, and granted the cross motion of the defendant Cushman In T, LLC, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it and on its counterclaim for a judgment declaring that it is entitled to retain the down payment.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order appealed from was superseded by an order of the same court dated July 31, 2008, made upon reargument (see Bigfoot Media Props., LLC v Cushman In T, LLC, ___ AD3d ___ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2018-10029; decided herewith]).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., DUFFY, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.