People ex rel. Francis v Brann

Annotate this Case
People ex rel. Francis v Brann 2019 NY Slip Op 03980 Decided on May 22, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 22, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
BETSY BARROS
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.
2019-05119 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Grover Francis, on behalf of Ahmad Daniels, petitioner,

v

Cynthia Brann, Commissioner, Department of Correction, respondent.



Janet E. Sabel, Staten Island, NY (Grover Francis, pro se, of counsel), for petitioner.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Adam Silberlight of counsel), for respondent.



Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Richmond County Indictment No. 104/19, and application by the petitioner for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

ORDERED that the application for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Kruger, 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230; People ex rel. Bender v Brann, 162 AD3d 727).

MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.