People v Arevalo

Annotate this Case
People v Arevalo 2019 NY Slip Op 07269 Decided on October 9, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 9, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
BETSY BARROS
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.
2016-08380
(Ind. No. 1684-14)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Jesus Arevalo, appellant.



Jesus Arevalo, Dannemora, NY, appellant pro se.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Daniel Bresnahan and Sarah S. Rabinowitz of counsel), for respondent.

Joseph F. DeFelice, Kew Gardens, NY, former appellate counsel.



DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated January 30, 2019 (People v Arevalo, 168 AD3d 1091), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered July 11, 2016.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).

RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.