Matter of Marcelle v Marcelle-Morrison

Annotate this Case
Matter of Marcelle v Marcelle-Morrison 2018 NY Slip Op 04322 Decided on June 13, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 13, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
MARK C. DILLON
JEFFREY A. COHEN
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
2016-13337
(Docket Nos. V-27627-15, V-27628-15)

[*1]In the Matter of Joyce Marcelle, petitioner,

v

Kimina J. Marcelle-Morrison, etc., respondent, Richard Charles Morrison, respondent-respondent; Jalen M. (Anonymous), et al., nonparty-appellants.



Karen P. Simmons, Brooklyn, NY (Janet Neustaetter and Barbara H. Dildine of counsel), for nonparty-appellants.

Robert Marinelli, New York, NY, for respondent-respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Sharon A. Bourne-Clarke, J.), dated November 15, 2016. The order, after a hearing, dismissed the petition of the maternal grandmother for custody of the subject children.



DECISION & ORDER

By order to show cause dated January 31, 2018, the Children's Law Center and counsel for the father were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal.

Upon the order to show cause, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The Children's Law Center had no authority to file a notice of appeal, or to appear, on behalf of the children, Jalen M. and Kai M., as the Children's Law Center was relieved as attorney for the children on November 15, 2016.

MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, COHEN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.