Matter of Manuel v Griffin

Annotate this Case
Matter of Manuel v Griffin 2018 NY Slip Op 03367 Decided on May 9, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 9, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
2016-11847
(Index No. 1300/16)

[*1]In the Matter of Barry Manuel, petitioner,

v

Thomas Griffin, etc., respondent.



Barry Manuel, Stormville, NY, petitioner pro se.

Barbara D. Underwood, Acting Attorney General, New York, NY (Andrew W. Amend and David Lawrence III of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional Facility dated February 22, 2016, which affirmed a determination of a hearing officer dated February 9, 2016, made after a Tier II disciplinary hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating Institutional Rules of Conduct rules 106.10, 109.10, and 109.12 (7 NYCRR 270.2[B][7][i]; [10][i], [iii]) and imposing penalties.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner's contentions, the misbehavior report and the hearing testimony provided substantial evidence to support the hearing officer's determination that the petitioner violated the subject disciplinary rules (see Matter of Antrobus v Lee, 140 AD3d 745; Matter of Burgess v Bellnier, 138 AD3d 989; Matter of Jackson v Prack, 137 AD3d 1133; Matter of Mitchell v Fischer, 300 AD2d 491).

RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER: Aprilanne Agostino Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.