People v Slavik
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 14, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
2016-11798
(Ind. No. 1225/96)
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Todd Slavik, appellant.
Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Lisa A. Marcoccia of counsel), for appellant.
Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Glenn Green of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.10(5) from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mark D. Cohen, J.), dated August 18, 2016, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.30(1-a) for forensic DNA testing of certain evidence.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed.
The defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.30(1-a) for DNA testing of evidence was properly denied, as the defendant failed to allege any facts demonstrating that there was a reasonable probability that the verdict would have been more favorable to him had DNA testing been performed and the results been admitted at trial (see People v Pitts, 4 NY3d 303, 311; People v Gentile, 156 AD3d 814; People v Letizia, 141 AD3d 1129; People v Kaminski, 61 AD3d 1113, 1115; People v Williams, 47 AD3d 648; People v Fuentes, 44 AD3d 871; People v Mattocks, 15 AD3d 676, 677).
MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.