People v Serrano

Annotate this Case
People v Serrano 2018 NY Slip Op 08155 Decided on November 28, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 28, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
MARK C. DILLON
JEFFREY A. COHEN
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
2014-07922
(Ind. No. 6664/12)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Gilberto Serrano, appellant.



The Legal Aid Society, New York, NY (Jeffrey Dellheim of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vincent M. Del Giudice, J.), rendered July 29, 2014, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

In the early morning hours of July 14, 2012, the defendant and the codefendant stabbed and killed a person (hereinafter the victim) outside a bar in Bensonhurst. Two taxi drivers, who were each parked nearby in their respective vehicles, witnessed the stabbing and called 911. The defendant and the codefendant were subsequently charged and, following a jury trial at which the taxi drivers testified, both were convicted of murder in the second degree. The defendant appeals.

The defendant correctly contends that the Supreme Court should not have allowed the People to elicit testimony from one of the taxi drivers that, while he was testifying, he felt intimidated by a courtroom spectator who was a member of the defendant's gang (cf. People v Kims, 24 NY3d 422, 438; People v Guerrero, 150 AD3d 883, 885; see generally People v Aska, 91 NY2d 979, 981). However, this error was harmless, as there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt, and no significant probability that the alleged error contributed to his conviction (see People v Grant, 7 NY3d 421, 423; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230; People v Williams, 56 AD3d 699, 699).

RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, COHEN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.