People v Fauntleroy

Annotate this Case
People v Fauntleroy 2018 NY Slip Op 03993 Decided on June 6, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 6, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
MARK C. DILLON
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.
1996-10107
(Ind. No. 9504/95)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Kareem Fauntleroy, appellant.



Kareem Fauntleroy, Attica, NY, appellant pro se.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Julian Joiris of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 22, 1999 (People v Fauntleroy, 258 AD2d 664), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 15, 1996.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).

RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, AUSTIN and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.