Matter of Ivies v Lasak

Annotate this Case
Matter of Ivies v Lasak 2017 NY Slip Op 09129 Decided on December 27, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 27, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
RUTH C. BALKIN
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
2016-06615 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]In the Matter of Louis Ivies, also known as Ricardo Jacquet, petitioner,

v

Gregory L. Lasak, etc., et al., respondents.



Ricardo Jacquet, named herein as Louis Ivies, also known as Ricardo Jacquet, Comstock, NY, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, NY (Michael A. Berg of counsel), for respondent Gregory L. Lasak.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondents from proceeding with an underlying criminal prosecution entitled People v Jacquet , commenced in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Indictment No. 2319/14, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This proceeding must be dismissed, as the petitioner failed to properly serve the respondents (see Lazich v Nicolai , 254 AD2d 420; Matter of Bell v State Univ. of N.Y. at Stony Brook , 185 AD2d 925; Matter of Kelly v Scully , 152 AD2d 698; Matter of Brown v Scully , 135 AD2d 713).

ENG, P.J., BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.