People v Garcia

Annotate this Case
People v Garcia 2017 NY Slip Op 08845 Decided on December 20, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 20, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
MARK C. DILLON
ROBERT J. MILLER
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
2016-01043
2016-01104

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Frank Garcia, appellant. (S.C.I. Nos. 2625/15, 10460/15)



Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Meredith S. Holt of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and William H. Branigan of counsel; Ryan Dolan on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from (1) a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Margulis, J.), imposed January 13, 2016, as amended February 25, 2016, under Superior Court Information No. 10460/15, and (2) a sentence of the same court, imposed January 13, 2016, under Superior Court Information No. 2625/15, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence imposed January 13, 2016, as amended February 25, 2016, and the sentence imposed January 13, 2016, are affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255; People v Reader, _____ AD3d _____, 2017 NY Slip Op 08286 [2d Dept 2017]).

ENG, P.J., DILLON, MILLER, HINDS-RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.