People v Harbison

Annotate this Case
People v Harbison 2017 NY Slip Op 06967 Decided on October 4, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 4, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SANDRA L. SGROI
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.
2015-09906
(Ind. No. 2360/13)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Stephan Harbison, also known as Stephan L. Harbison, appellant.



Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Elizabeth Miller of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Condon, J.), rendered August 26, 2015, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court failed to conduct a proper inquiry into his postplea arrest before imposing an enhanced sentence is unpreserved for appellate review (People v Stafford, 115 AD3d 683), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and LASALLE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.