Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Labunska

Annotate this Case
Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Labunska 2015 NY Slip Op 07652 Decided on October 21, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 21, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
L. PRISCILLA HALL
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, JJ.
2015-02785
(Index No. 15231/14)

[*1]In the Matter of Allstate Insurance Company, appellant,

v

Rita Labunska, et al., respondents.



Karen L. Lawrence (Sweetbaum & Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. [Marshall D. Sweetbaum], of counsel), for appellant.

Asher & Associates, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Roberta D. Asher of counsel), for respondents.



DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rouse, J.), dated January 29, 2015, which denied the petition and confirmed the arbitration award.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Where, as here, review of a compulsory arbitration award is sought, "decisional law imposes closer judicial scrutiny of the arbitrator's determination" than would be warranted when reviewing an award made after a consensual arbitration (Matter of Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 89 NY2d 214, 223; see Matter of Furstenberg [Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.-Allstate Ins. Co.], 49 NY2d 757, 758) and, to be upheld, the award "must have evidentiary support and cannot be arbitrary and capricious" (Matter of Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 89 NY2d at 223; see Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v City of Yonkers, 21 AD3d 1110, 1111). Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the arbitration award here has evidentiary support in the record and is not arbitrary and capricious.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition to vacate the arbitration award and confirmed the award.

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HALL and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.