Cohen v Cohen

Annotate this Case
Cohen v Cohen 2015 NY Slip Op 07239 Decided on October 7, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 7, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
SANDRA L. SGROI
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.
2013-07948
(Index No. 204031/01)

[*1]Allan Cohen, appellant,

v

Joan Cohen, respondent.



Allan Cohen, Syosset, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Victor Levin, P.C., Garden City, N.Y., for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jerome C. Murphy, J.), entered June 20, 2013. The order denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to renew his prior motion, inter alia, to compel the defendant to compensate him for damages resulting from the diminution in value of the marital residence caused by the defendant, which had been denied in an order of that court dated October 15, 2012.

ORDERED that the order entered June 20, 2013, is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion for leave to renew his motion, inter alia, to compel the defendant to compensate him for damages resulting from the diminution in value of the marital residence caused by the defendant. The plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the "new facts" upon renewal would have changed the prior determination (CPLR 2221[e][2]; see US Bank, N.A. v Morrison, 120 AD3d 1222, 1223).

BALKIN, J.P., ROMAN, SGROI and LASALLE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.