Quartarolo-Johanson v Johanson

Annotate this Case
Quartarolo-Johanson v Johanson 2015 NY Slip Op 06124 Decided on July 15, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 15, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.
L. PRISCILLA HALL
SANDRA L. SGROI
BETSY BARROS, JJ.
2013-07940
(Index No. 201892/10)

[*1]Alison Quartarolo-Johanson, respondent,

v

Roy Johanson, appellant.



Roy Johanson, Oyster Bay, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Jonathan E. Kroll & Associates, PLLC, Garden City, N.Y. (Jason L.M. Wand of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Edward A. Maron, J.), entered June 27, 2013. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, upon a decision dated March 14, 2013, made after a nonjury trial, awarded taxable maintenance to the plaintiff in the sum of $1,500 per month, commencing on July 1, 2010, and continuing until June 1, 2015, and failed to award the defendant a separate property credit in the sum of $74,019.45.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

"[T]he amount and duration of maintenance is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court and every case must be determined on its unique facts" (Mazzone v Mazzone, 290 AD2d 495). Upon our review of the record, we find that the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in awarding maintenance to the plaintiff in the sum of $1,500 per month for a period of five years, retroactive to the date of commencement of the action.

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

SKELOS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.