Pappas v Pappas

Annotate this Case
Pappas v Pappas 2015 NY Slip Op 09411 Decided on December 23, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 23, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
MARK C. DILLON
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.
2013-07013
(Index No. 203531/04)

[*1]Maria Pappas, respondent,

v

Anthony Pappas, appellant.



Langione, Catterson & LoFrumento, LLP, Garden City, NY (Jeffrey L. Catterson of counsel), for appellant.

Kruman & Kruman, P.C., Malverne, NY (Henry E. Kruman of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Hope Schwartz Zimmerman, J.), dated May 13, 2013. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the defendant's motion to refer the plaintiff to the District Attorney on the basis of her alleged perjurious sworn testimony.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his motion to refer the plaintiff to the District Attorney based on her allegedly perjurious sworn testimony (see Stow v Stow , 262 AD2d 550, 551; Matter of Carroll v Gammerman , 193 AD2d 202, 206).

RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, CHAMBERS and LASALLE, JJ., concur.

ENTER: Aprilanne Agostino Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.