74 Eldert, LLC v Sharp Realty, LLC

Annotate this Case
74 Eldert, LLC v Sharp Realty, LLC 2015 NY Slip Op 04837 Decided on June 10, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 10, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
ROBERT J. MILLER
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, JJ.
2013-05858
(Index No. 502964/12)

[*1]74 Eldert, LLC, respondent,

v

Sharp Realty, LLC, et al., defendants, Cie Sharp, appellant.



Cie Sharp, Huntington Station, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Gallet Dreyer & Berkey, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Morrell I. Berkowitz and Joseph V. Aulicino of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, for the specific performance of a contract, the defendant Cie Sharp appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pfau, J.), dated May 9, 2013, as denied his motion to vacate a so-ordered stipulation of settlement dated October 10, 2012.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion to vacate a so-ordered stipulation of settlement dated October 10, 2012 (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230; Dubi v Skiros Corp., 66 AD3d 954; Ramnarain v Ramnarain, 46 AD3d 655, 656; Chan v Barry, 36 AD3d 579).

The plaintiff's request for certain affirmative relief is not properly before this Court, since it did not cross-appeal from the order appealed from (see Hecht v City of New York, 60 NY2d 57, 60-62; Matter of White Plains Plaza Realty, LLC v Cappelli Enters., Inc., 108 AD3d 634, 638).

SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, MILLER and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.

ENTER: Aprilanne Agostino Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.