People v Stockinger

Annotate this Case
People v Stockinger 2015 NY Slip Op 06525 Decided on August 12, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 12, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
RUTH C. BALKIN
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.
2012-07774

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Scot H. Stockinger, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 1551/12)



Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Karla Lato of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), imposed July 16, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant has completed the term of imprisonment imposed and, thus, his contention that this portion of the sentence was excessive has been rendered academic (see People v Russillo, 27 AD3d 493, 494).

The period of postrelease supervision imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

ENG, P.J., BALKIN, DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and DUFFY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.