Matter of Tsulyn A. (Deborah A.)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Tsulyn A. (Deborah A.) 2014 NY Slip Op 02040 Decided on March 26, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 26, 2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2013-07754
(Docket No. N-13170-09)

[*1]In the Matter of Tsulyn A. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, respondent;

and

Deborah A. (Anonymous), appellant.




George E. Reed, Jr., White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.
Robert F. Meehan, County Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (James
Castro-Blanco and Christopher J.
Inzero of counsel), for respondent.
Anne R. Mueller, West Harrison, N.Y., attorney for the child.


DECISION & ORDER

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Lammers, Ct. Atty. Ref.), entered July 19, 2013, which, inter alia, after a permanency hearing, continued the permanency goal of placement for adoption with regard to the subject child.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court's determination to continue the subject child's placement in a kinship foster home, with the permanency goal of placement for adoption, and to continue supervised visitation, had a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Diana B. v Lorry B., 111 AD3d 928, 929; Matter of Duane S., Jr. [Duane S.], 103 AD3d 645; Matter of Acension C.L. [Jesate J.], 96 AD3d 1059, 1060).
MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino [*2]

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.