Matter of Benicio H. (Charlene H.)

Matter of Benicio H. (Charlene H.) 2014 NY Slip Op 01750 Decided on March 19, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 19, 2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.
PLUMMER E. LOTT
SHERI S. ROMAN
JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.
2013-04229
(Docket No. N-1149-13)

[*1]In the Matter of Benicio H. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, respondent;

and

Charlene H. (Anonymous), appellant.




Glen A. Suarez, Huntington, N.Y., for appellant.
Dennis M. Brown, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (Gary
Rosenthal of counsel), for
respondent.
Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (John B. Belmonte of
counsel), attorney for the child.


DECISION & ORDER

In a neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated April 1, 2013, which, after a fact finding hearing, found that she neglected the subject child, and upon her failure to appear at the dispositional hearing, placed the child with the maternal great aunt.

ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order of fact-finding and disposition as placed the child with the maternal great aunt upon the mother's failure to appear at the dispositional hearing is dismissed without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from that portion of the order which was entered upon the mother's default (see Matter of Alexis Latoya Revell W., 9 AD3d 368); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, including the mother's use of cocaine during her pregnancy with the subject child and her positive drug test within a few months after his birth, the Family Court did not err in concluding that the petitioner demonstrated a prima facie case of neglect against the mother with respect to the subject child (see Family Ct Act § 1046[a][iii]; see also Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. v Denise J., 87 NY2d 73).
SKELOS, J.P., LOTT, ROMAN and COHEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court