HCA Equip. Fin., LLC v Mastrantone

Annotate this Case
HCA Equip. Fin., LLC v Mastrantone 2014 NY Slip Op 04465 Decided on June 18, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 18, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
THOMAS A. DICKERSON, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
L. PRISCILLA HALL
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2013-03990
(Index No. 3011/11)

[*1]HCA Equipment Finance, LLC, respondent,

v

Matthew Mastrantone, appellant.



Matthew Mastrantone, Garrison, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Magnozzi & Kye, LLP, Huntington, N.Y. (Cynthia S. Butera of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Lubell, J.), dated February 27, 2013, which, upon an order of the same court dated January 11, 2013, granting the plaintiff's unopposed motion for summary judgment on the complaint and to dismiss the affirmative defenses, among other things, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $117,055.46.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The defendant failed to submit papers to the Supreme Court in opposition to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the complaint and to dismiss the affirmative defenses, and the motion was granted on default. "No appeal lies from an order or judgment granted upon the default of the appealing party" (J.F.J. Fuel, Inc. v Tran Camp Contr. Corp., 105 AD3d 908, 908; see CPLR 5511). Since the judgment appealed from was entered upon the defendant's default in opposing the motion, the appeal must be dismissed (see Lumbermen's Mut. Cas. Co. v Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co., 117 AD2d 588).

DICKERSON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HALL and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.