Matter of McDowell

Annotate this Case
Matter of McDowell 2014 NY Slip Op 04493 Decided on June 18, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department Per Curiam. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 18, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
REINALDO E. RIVERA
PETER B. SKELOS
PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.
2013-03793

[*1]In the Matter of Derek P. McDowell, a suspended attorney. Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, petitioner; Derek P. McDowell, respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 1648229)

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts. The respondent was admitted to the bar on November 14, 1979, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 26, 2013, inter alia, the respondent was immediately suspended pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.4(l )(1)(i). By decision and order on application of this Court dated May 29, 2013, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding against the respondent based on a petition dated March 12, 2013, the respondent was directed to serve and file an answer to the petition within 20 days, and the issues raised were referred to the Honorable Charles Thomas, as Special Referee, to hear and report.



Diana Maxfield Kearse, Brooklyn, N.Y., for petitioner.




PER CURIAM.

OPINION & ORDER

The Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts moves to adjudicate the respondent in default with respect to a petition dated March 12, 2013.

The petition contains a single charge, alleging that the respondent converted funds entrusted to him in connection with a real estate transaction.

On June 20, 2013, the respondent was personally served with a copy of this Court's decision and order on motion dated April 26, 2013, inter alia, immediately suspending him pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.4(l )(1)(i), and a copy of this Court's decision and order on application dated May 29, 2013, authorizing the Grievance Committee to institute a disciplinary proceeding against the respondent based on the allegations set forth in the petition dated March 12, 2013. To date, the respondent has failed to serve an answer to that petition or request additional time in which to do so.

On September 16, 2013, a copy of the Grievance Committee's motion to hold the respondent in default was personally delivered to the respondent, and copies were mailed to him by regular and certified mail.

To date, the respondent has neither responded to the motion nor requested additional time in which to do so.

Accordingly, the Grievance Committee's motion is granted, the charge is deemed established, and, effective immediately, the respondent is disbarred upon his default, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. We note that, in an opinion and order in a related disciplinary proceeding commenced against the respondent, this Court granted the Grievance Committee's separate motion to hold the respondent in default in connection with a petition dated January 14, 2013, based on allegations that the respondent failed to submit an answer to a complaint of professional misconduct filed against him by Laurice Mann, and disbarred the respondent effective immediately (see Matter of McDowell , _____AD3d_____ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2013-00539; decided herewith]).

ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, SKELOS and LOTT, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the petitioner's motion to adjudicate the respondent to be in default is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Derek P. McDowell, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent, Derek P. McDowell, shall continue to comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Derek P. McDowell, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,

ORDERED that if the respondent, Derek P. McDowell, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10(f).

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.