Matter of Katz v Shomron

Annotate this Case
Matter of Katz v Shomron 2014 NY Slip Op 02437 Decided on April 9, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 9, 2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
L. PRISCILLA HALL
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.
2013-02676
(Docket Nos. V-29537-06, V-29538-06, V-5117-07, V-5118-07)

[*1]In the Matter of Stefanie Katz, respondent,

v

Orya Shomron, appellant.




Orya Shomron, Belfast, Maine, appellant pro se.
Gordon A. Burrows, White Plains, N.Y., for respondent.
Karen P. Simmons, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Janet Neustaetter of
counsel), attorney for the children.


DECISION & ORDER

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Katz, J.), dated February 5, 2013, which, without a hearing, granted the mother's petition for permission to relocate with the parties' children to Rockland County or Westchester County.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father's contention, the Family Court possessed adequate relevant information to enable it to make an informed and provident determination, without a hearing, as to whether it was in the subject children's best interests to relocate with their mother (see Matter of Hom v Zullo, 6 AD3d 536). The mother established a change of circumstances and that the proposed relocation to Rockland County or Westchester County would serve the subject children's best interests (see Matter of Tropea v Tropea, 87 NY2d 727). The mother also established that the proposed move would not have a negative impact on the children's relationship with the father (see Matter of Linn v Wilson, 68 AD3d 1767).

The father's remaining contention is without merit.
DILLON, J.P., HALL, AUSTIN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.

ENTER: [*2]

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.