Matter of Koch v Board of Assessors of Nassau County

Annotate this Case
Matter of Koch v Board of Assessors of Nassau County 2014 NY Slip Op 02585 Decided on April 16, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 16, 2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
ROBERT J. MILLER
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.
2013-00340
(Index No. 402672/09)

[*1]In the Matter of Joseph J. Koch, et al., respondents,

v

Board of Assessors of Nassau County, et al., appellants.




Carnell T. Foskey, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Robert F. Van
der Waag, of counsel), for appellants.
Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, East Meadow, N.Y.
(M. Allan Hyman of counsel), for
respondents.


DECISION & ORDER

In a consolidated proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7 to review tax assessments of the petitioners' real properties for certain tax years, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered October 12, 2012, which granted the petitioners' motion, inter alia, to compel the appellants to satisfy obligations that the appellants incurred in connection with stipulations of settlement executed pursuant to RPTL 523-b(9).

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed, as the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the proceeding on December 13, 2012 (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248), and the appeal from the judgment has been dismissed in a decision and order of this Court dated October 21, 2013 (see Matter of Koch v Board of Assessors of Nassau County, _____ AD3d _____, 2013 NY Slip Op 88860[U] [2d Dept 2013]).
ENG, P.J., MILLER, HINDS-RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.