U.S. Bank N.A. v Smith

Annotate this Case
U.S. Bank N.A. v Smith 2014 NY Slip Op 08831 Decided on December 17, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 17, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
SANDRA L. SGROI
ROBERT J. MILLER
BETSY BARROS, JJ.
2013-00295
(Index No. 34/10)

[*1]U.S. Bank National Association, etc., appellant,

v

Donnette Smith, respondent, et al., defendants.



Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, N.Y. (David Dunn, Nicole E. Schiavo, Chava Brandriss, and Sean Marotta of counsel), and Gross Polowy Orlans, LLC, Amherst, N.Y. (Dennis Jose of counsel), for appellant (one brief filed).

Jeanette Zelhof, New York, N.Y. (Aaron Jacobs-Smith and Chantal Hernandez of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated October 5, 2012, as, after settlement conferences pursuant to CPLR 3408, directed the continuation of a toll of the accrual of interest on the subject mortgage loan "pending further order of [the court] or the parties reaching an agreement on the terms of a modification."

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies as of right from an order which does not determine a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701[a][2]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal since the appeal is academic in light of our determination of a companion appeal (see U.S. Bank National Association v Smith, _____ AD3d _____ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2013-08653; decided herewith]).

CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, MILLER and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.