U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v Eaddy

Annotate this Case
U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v Eaddy 2014 NY Slip Op 08632 Decided on December 10, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 10, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
PETER B. SKELOS
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.
2013-00190
(Index No. 9898/07)

[*1]U.S. Bank National Association, etc., respondent,

v

Shelley R. Eaddy, appellant, et al., defendants.



Shelley R. Eaddy, Stony Point, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, N.Y. (David Dunn and Jordan L. Estes of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Shelley R. Eaddy appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Alfieri, Jr., J.), dated October 9, 2012, which denied her motion, in effect, for leave to reargue her prior motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a) to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court (Berliner, J.), dated September 9, 2009, entered upon her failure to appear or answer the complaint, which had been denied in an order of the same court (Alfieri, Jr., J.), dated July 5, 2011.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The motion of the defendant Shelley R. Eaddy was, in effect, one for leave to reargue. Since "no appeal lies from an order denying leave to reargue" (O'Brien v O'Brien, 115 AD3d 720, 721-722), Eaddy's appeal must be dismissed (see JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Smith Elec. Contr., Inc., 117 AD3d 909; Matter of County of Broome, 90 AD3d 1260).

MASTRO, J.P., SKELOS, ROMAN and MALTESE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.