People v Mack

Annotate this Case
People v Mack 2014 NY Slip Op 05447 Decided on July 23, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 23, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
RUTH C. BALKIN
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, JJ.
2012-10763
(Ind. No. 7634/08)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Quallique Mack, appellant.



Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Eve Kessler of counsel), for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Drake A. Colley of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Mullen, J.), upon a finding that he violated conditions thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a term of imprisonment upon his previous convictions of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree imposed November 27, 2012, on the ground that the amended sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the amended sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal, the validity of which he does not challenge on appeal, precludes review of his claim that the amended sentence imposed, upon his admission that he violated conditions of his probation, was excessive (see People v Whitlock, 114 AD3d 970; People v Emma, 101 AD3d 1146; People v Sansone, 65 AD3d 636).

ENG, P.J., BALKIN, DICKERSON and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.