People v Tacneau

Annotate this Case
People v Tacneau 2014 NY Slip Op 04971 Decided on July 2, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 2, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
L. PRISCILLA HALL, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Farran Tacneau, appellant.



Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Michael McLaughlin of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Nicoletta J. Caferri, and Nancy Fitzpatrick Talcott of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Holder, J.), rendered July 10, 2012, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and a new trial is ordered.

To the extent that the defendant failed to preserve his challenge to all of the errors asserted in his appeal, we nevertheless reach them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v McDuffie, 95 AD3d 1036, 1037; People v Friedman, 14 AD3d 713, 714). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of conviction and order a new trial (see People v Henry, ___AD3d___ [decided herewith]).

In light of our determination, we need not address the defendant's remaining contention.

HALL, J.P., ROMAN, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.