People v Rivera

Annotate this Case
People v Rivera 2014 NY Slip Op 02319 Decided on April 2, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 2, 2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
PLUMMER E. LOTT
SHERI S. ROMAN
JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.
2012-01201
(Ind. No. 305/11)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Luis Rivera, appellant.




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Denise A. Corsí of counsel),
for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John
M. Castellano, Andrea Alvarez-
Calderon, and Jennifer Hagan of counsel), for
respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered January 18, 2012, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, possession of burglar's tools, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in disallowing his peremptory challenge to a prospective juror because defense counsel provided a sufficient race-neutral explanation for the challenge (see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79; People v Kern, 75 NY2d 638). Defense counsel's proffered explanation was that "[n]o one seemed to ask [the juror] anything," and defense counsel "didn't get enough about [the juror]," "didn't ask a lot of questions," and "didn't have anything in line with [the juror]." This explanation amounted, essentially, to no reason at all (see People v Erskine, 90 AD3d 674, 674-675; People v Carillo, 9 AD3d 333, 334; People v Padgett, 303 AD2d 524; People v Smith, 251 AD2d 355). Thus, the Supreme Court properly disallowed the defendant's peremptory challenge.
RIVERA, J.P., LOTT, ROMAN and COHEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.