People v Litchmore
Annotate this CaseDecided on April 16, 2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
SANDRA L. SGROI
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.
2011-02346
(Ind. No. 5548/09)
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Alonzo Litchmore, appellant.
Scott A. Rosenberg, New York, N.Y. (William B. Carney of
counsel), for appellant.
Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y.
(Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of
counsel; Gregory Musso on the brief),
for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered February 8, 2011, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (three counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that his plea was not knowing and voluntary is unpreserved for appellate review, since he failed to move to withdraw his plea (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Johnson, 73 AD3d 951; People v Vasquez, 40 AD3d 1134; People v Wilson, 37 AD3d 744, 745). In any event, the record of the plea proceeding establishes that the plea was knowing and voluntary (see People v Elcine, 43 AD3d 1176, 1177).
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, SGROI and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER: [*2]
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.