People v Tate

Annotate this Case
People v Tate 2014 NY Slip Op 01777 Decided on March 19, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 19, 2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.
2010-04089
(Ind. No. 556/09)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Shammel Tate, appellant.




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Joshua M. Levine of counsel),
for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John
M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and
Deborah E. Wassel of counsel), for
respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered March 18, 2010, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by certain alleged prosecutorial misconduct on summation is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Faustin, 35 AD3d 499), and, in any event, without merit.

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.