People ex rel. Lavallee v New York State Attorney General's Off.

Annotate this Case
People ex rel. Lavallee v New York State Attorney General's Off. 2013 NY Slip Op 05659 Decided on August 15, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 15, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, JJ.
2013-07925

[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Thomas J. Lavallee, on behalf of Anand Persaud, petitioner,

v

New York State Attorney General's Office, respondent.




Lavallee Law Offices, Farmingdale, N.Y. (Thomas J. Lavallee pro
se of counsel), for petitioner.
Eric G. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y.
(Crystal Barrow of counsel), for respondent.


DECISION & JUDGMENT

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application on behalf of Anand Persaud to modify an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 2, 2013, which granted bail on certain conditions upon Nassau County Docket No. 2013NA017262.

ADJUDGED that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that the condition imposed by the order dated August 2, 2013, limiting the travel of Anand Persaud to his attorney's office and the homes of family members in Queens County, is eliminated and replaced by a condition allowing Anand Persaud to travel to any location (A) where the electronic monitoring device worn by Anand Persaud is functional, as determined by the Nassau County Department of Probation, and (B) that is within a 100-mile radius of Anand Persaud's residence, and the application is otherwise denied.
SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, LEVENTHAL and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.