Suk Cho Kim v Eun Jung Kim

Suk Cho Kim v Eun Jung Kim 2013 NY Slip Op 05522 Decided on July 31, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 31, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.
2013-00587
(Index No. 15362/10)

[*1]Suk Cho Kim, appellant,

v

Eun Jung Kim, respondent.




Law Offices of Howard B. Felcher, PLLC, New York, N.Y.
(Alexander M. Warshow of counsel), for appellant.
Carway and Flipse, Mineola, N.Y. (Adrienne Flipse Hausch and
Daniel S. Gerson of counsel), for
respondent.
Adewole Agbayewa, Fresh Meadows, N.Y., attorney for the
children.


DECISION & ORDER

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Jackman-Brown, J.), dated January 3, 2013, which denied his motion, in effect, to compel disclosure of all underlying data, empirical test results, records, and notes utilized by a court-appointed forensic evaluator in preparing a report dated October 6, 2011.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the particular circumstances presented here, the plaintiff failed to establish his entitlement to the relief sought (see CPLR article 31).
RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, LEVENTHAL and COHEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court