Trujillo v Schatzel

Annotate this Case
Trujillo v Schatzel 2013 NY Slip Op 00477 Decided on January 30, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 30, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2012-07637
(Index No. 987/09)

[*1]Rusbel A. Trujillo, respondent,

v

Jason F. Schatzel, appellant. David J. Sobel, P.C., Smithtown, N.Y., for appellant.




Steven D. Dollinger, Huntington Station, N.Y. (Susan R. Nudelman
of counsel), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), dated June 20, 2012, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant met his prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957). The defendant submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the alleged injuries did not constitute serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) (see Fudol v Sullivan, 38 AD3d 593, 594).

In opposition, however, the plaintiff submitted evidence raising triable issues of fact as to whether he sustained serious injuries (see Perl v Meher, 18 NY3d 208, 218- 219). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ANGIOLILLO, J.P., BALKIN, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.