Matter of Audrey K. (Erik K.)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Audrey K. (Erik K.) 2013 NY Slip Op 05459 Decided on July 24, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 24, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
PETER B. SKELOS
RUTH C. BALKIN
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, JJ.
2012-05184
(Docket No. N-19272-11)

[*1]In the Matter of Audrey K. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, respondent;

and

Erik K. (Anonymous), appellant.




Arza Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y. (Steven A. Feldman of counsel),
for appellant.
Dennis M. Brown, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (James
G. Bernet of counsel), for respondent.
Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (John B. Belmonte of
counsel), attorney for the child.


DECISION & ORDER

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Loguercio, J.), dated May 8, 2012, which, upon a decision of the same court dated April 20, 2012, made after a fact-finding hearing, inter alia, found that he neglected the subject child. The notice of appeal from the decision is deemed to be a notice of appeal from the order of fact-finding and disposition (see CPLR 5512[a]).

ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court's finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act §§ 1012[f][i][B]; 1046[a][iii], [b][i]). Contrary to the father's contentions, the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing of his repeated misuse of drugs established a prima facie case of neglect and, therefore, neither actual impairment of the child's physical, mental, or emotional condition, nor specific risk of impairment, needed to be established (see Matter of Sadiq H. [Karl H.], 81 AD3d 647).

The parties' remaining contentions need not be reached in light of our determination.
MASTRO, J.P., SKELOS, BALKIN and LEVENTHAL, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.