People v Paddyfote

Annotate this Case
People v Paddyfote 2013 NY Slip Op 04033 Decided on June 5, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 5, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
MARK C. DILLON
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.
2012-04196
(Ind. No. 119/10)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Kenneth A. Paddyfote III, appellant.




Jeanette Madera, Poughkeepsie, N.Y., for appellant.
William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
(Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel),
for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed November 16, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground, inter alia, that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the County Court made several inaccurate and inconsistent statements during the plea and sentencing proceedings, and that he is thus entitled to be resentenced. This contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725; People v Poznanski, 105 AD3d 775; People v Williams, 70 AD3d 1059, 1060; People v Williams, 156 AD2d 608), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., DILLON, CHAMBERS and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.