People v Santana

Annotate this Case
People v Santana 2013 NY Slip Op 01387 Decided on March 6, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 6, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
L. PRISCILLA HALL
SHERI S. ROMAN
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2012-03315

[*1]People of State of New York, respondent,

v

Aristides Santana, appellant.




Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (James H. Miller III of
counsel), for appellant.
Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Michael
J. Brennan of counsel), for
respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated March 26, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly determined that he was not entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. Thus, he was properly designated a level three sex offender (see People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112, 128-129; People v Bowden, 88 AD3d 972, 973; People v Mondo, 88 AD3d 676; People v Livingston, 87 AD3d 628).
RIVERA, J.P., HALL, ROMAN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.