People v Harris

Annotate this Case
People v Harris 2013 NY Slip Op 05836 Decided on September 11, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 11, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
MARK C. DILLON
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.
2011-07304
(Ind. No. 151-11)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Renaica L. Harris, appellant.




Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of
counsel), for appellant.
Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y.
(Rosalind C. Gray of counsel), for
respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), imposed July 13, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of her right to appeal was invalid (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 257; People v Grant, 83 AD3d 862, 862-63; People v Bradshaw, 76 AD3d 566, 569, affd 18 NY3d 257, 264; see also People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283) and, thus, does not preclude review of her excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., DILLON, CHAMBERS and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.