People v Cedeno

Annotate this Case
People v Cedeno 2013 NY Slip Op 04019 Decided on June 5, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 5, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
SHERI S. ROMAN
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
2011-00789
(Ind. No. 2394/10)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Luis Cedeno, appellant.




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of
counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Joyce Slevin of counsel;
Gregory Musso on the memorandum),
for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dwyer J.), rendered September 30, 2010, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737).

The defendant's contention concerning the duration of certain orders of protection survives his valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Smith, 83 AD3d 1213; People v Allen, 64 AD3d 1190, 1191; People v Victor, 20 AD3d 927, 928). The defendant, however, failed to preserve this contention for appellate review, since he neither raised this issue at sentencing nor moved to amend the final orders of protection on this ground (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 316-318; People v Remington, 90 AD3d 678, 679; People v Foster, 87 AD3d 299, 304; People v Maxineau, 78 AD3d 732, 732; People v Langhorne, 60 AD3d 867), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.