People v Johnson

Annotate this Case
People v Johnson 2013 NY Slip Op 08662 Decided on December 26, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 26, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
ROBERT J. MILLER
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, JJ.
2010-04568
(Ind. No. 4319/86)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Lamonte Johnson, appellant.




Lamonte Johnson, Ossining, N.Y., appellant pro se.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Joyce Slevin of counsel),
for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated March 26, 2010, as denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.30(1-a) for DNA testing of certain evidence.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.30(1-a) for DNA testing of certain evidence since the defendant failed to show that there was a reasonable probability that the verdict would have been more favorable to him had DNA tests been performed (see CPL 440.30[1-a]; People v Perry, 89 AD3d 1114, 1115; People v Bolling, 65 AD3d 1054, 1054; People v Weay, 54 AD3d 695, 695).

Although the defendant also moved to vacate the judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10, the issues raised in that motion are not properly before this Court, as he was denied leave to appeal from so much of the order as denied that motion by decision and order on application of this Court dated August 12, 2010 (see People v Jean, 74 AD3d 1234, 1234; People v DeLuca, 45 AD3d 777, 778; People v Rivas, 206 AD2d 549, 550).
MASTRO, J.P., ROMAN, MILLER and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.