People v Matthews

Annotate this Case
People v Matthews 2013 NY Slip Op 00110 Decided on January 9, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 9, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2009-09581
2009-09582

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Hashim Matthews, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 724/02, 7737/02)




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of
counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Linda S. Breen of counsel;
Gamaliel Marrero on the brief), for
respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two resentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), both imposed October 6, 2009, upon his convictions of rape in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 724/02, and sexual abuse in the first degree under Indictment No. 7737/02, upon his pleas of guilty. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the resentences are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).
ANGIOLILLO, J.P., BALKIN, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino [*2]

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.