People v Koehl

Annotate this Case
People v Koehl 2013 NY Slip Op 05759 Decided on August 28, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 28, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, J.P.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
SANDRA L. SGROI
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, JJ.
1994-03169
1994-03170

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Edward Koehl, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 352/89, 189/92)




Edward Koehl, Stormville, N.Y., appellant pro se.
Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y.
(Anne Grady of counsel), for
respondent.
Sally Wasserman, New York, N.Y., former appellate counsel.


DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 28, 1999 (People v Koehl, 262 AD2d 659), affirming two judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, both rendered April 5, 1994.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
ANGIOLILLO, J.P., DICKERSON, SGROI and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.