Matter of Copeland v People

Annotate this Case
Matter of Matter of Copeland v People 2012 NY Slip Op 07663 Decided on November 14, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 14, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
PETER B. SKELOS
ANITA R. FLORIO
THOMAS A. DICKERSON, JJ.
2012-05013 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]In the Matter of Arturo Copeland, petitioner,

v

People of State of New York, respondent. Arturo Copeland, Oakdale, Louisiana, petitioner pro se.




Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Charles
F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the determination of the petitioner's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 in a criminal action entitled People v Copeland, pending in the Criminal Court, Kings County, under Indictment No. 39420/09, and application by the petitioner to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding (see CPLR 506[b]; 7804[b]).
MASTRO, J.P., SKELOS, FLORIO and DICKERSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.