Matter of Hackett v Paluck
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 21, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.
2012-01619
(Docket No. F-07789-11/11A)
[*1]In the Matter of Barbara Hackett, respondent,
v
Michael Paluck, appellant. The Law Offices of Richard J. DaVolio, P.C., Patchogue, N.Y., for appellant. Anthony M. Bramante, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an amended order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Kent, J.), dated January 24, 2012, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Watson, S.M.), dated September 6, 2011, which, inter alia, after a hearing, and upon the parties' consent, directed the entry of a money judgment in favor of the mother and against him in the principal sum of $29,445.61.
ORDERED that the amended order dated January 24, 2012, is affirmed, with costs.
The Family Court properly denied the father's objections to the order dated September 6, 2011, as that order was entered upon the consent of the parties (see Matter of Cabral v Cabral, 61 AD3d 863; Matter of Bien-Aime-Schneider v Schneider, 5 AD3d 763; Matter of Proulx v Ardito, 289 AD2d 581; Matter of Benerofe v Wechsler, 281 AD2d 476, 477).
MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, CHAMBERS and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.